ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: Comparison of laser therapy (LT) outcomes in patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) followed up in our clinic and referred from other centers. Methods: Medical records of 1,856 ROP patients were retrospectively evaluated, and a total of 128 patients who underwent LT were included in the study. The study population was divided into the following two groups: patients who were followed up and treated in our clinic (group 1, N=45) and patients who were referred to our clinic from other centers (group 2, N=83). Data regarding birth weight, sex, gestational age, postnatal treatment time, disease localization, and stage were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Treatment success was defined by anatomic success 6 months after treatment. Results: Patients in the referred group presented with a more advanced disease (p<0.01), a lower treatment success rate (p=0.01), and a longer time interval between diagnosis and LT (p=0.04). Conclusions: The treatment success rate of ROP was significantly lower in referred patients because of the potential delay in LT and more advanced disease at the time of treatment initiation.
RESUMO Objetivos: A comparação dos resultados da terapia a laser (LT) em pacientes com retinopatia da prematuridade (ROP) acompanhados em nossa clínica e encaminhados por outras clínicas. Método: Os arquivos de 1.856 pacientes com ROP foram analisados retrospectivamente e um total de 128 pacientes submetidos à LT foram incluídos no estudo. A população do estudo foi dividida em dois grupos; os pacientes que foram acompanhados e tratados em nossa clínica (grupo 1, n=45) e os pacientes que foram encaminhados à nossa clínica por outros centros (grupo 2, n=83). Os dados referentes a peso de nascimento, sexo, idade gestacional, tempo de tratamento pós-natal, localização e fase da doença foram analisados e comparados entre os grupos. O sucesso do tratamento foi definido pelo sucesso anatômico no sexto mês após o tratamento. Resultados: Pacientes no grupo de pacientes encaminhados apresentaram doença mais avançada (p<0,01), taxa de sucesso inferior (p=0,01) e maior intervalo de tempo entre o diagnóstico e tratamento a laser (p=0,04). Conclusões: A taxa de sucesso do tratamento da ROP é significativamente menor em pacientes encaminhados por causa de possível atraso da LT e do estágio mais avançado da doença observado.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Birth Weight , Retinopathy of Prematurity/therapy , Laser Coagulation/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Gestational Age , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Aim: We sought to identify differences in the following measures of the ocular response analyser (ORA) between primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and exfoliative glaucoma (EXG) patients: Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal‑compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann‑correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg). We also sought to relate these ORA measures with central corneal thickness (CCT). Materials and Methods: This cross‑sectional study was conducted on a total of 162 individuals (46 EXG patients, 66 POAG patients and 50 healthy subjects without any ocular and systemic disease). ORA measurements were performed, and a minimum of three readings were obtained from each test subject. Groups were compared according to their ORA parameters. Results: The mean CH levels of the EXG, POAG and healthy subjects were 7.6 ± 2.1, 9.1 ± 1.9 and 9.6 ± 1.7 mmHg, respectively. CH was significantly lower in the EXG patients compared to the other groups (P < 0.001).The mean CRF levels of the EXG, POAG and healthy subjects were 9.0 ± 2.0, 10.1 ± 1.7 and 9.8 ± 1.8mmHg, respectively. CRF levels in the eyes of the EXG patients were significantly lower compared to those of either the POAG patients (P = 0.005) or the healthy subjects (P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in CRF levels between the POAG patients and the healthy subjects (P = 0.59). There was a significant positive correlation between CH and CCT in the EXG patients and healthy subjects (P < 0.001), but this correlation was not present in the POAG patients (P = 0.70). Conclusions: In this study, CH and CRF were found to be significantly reduced in the eyes of EXG patients compared to both the POAG patients and healthy subjects. Reduced CH in EXG patients might result in decreased support of peripapillary scleral structure and increased damage to the optic nerve during IOP increase.